Bachelor thesis seminar (E)
Niveau
Bachelor
Learning outcomes of the courses/module
Students deepen their knowledge of the formal and structural requirements of a scientific Bachelor’s thesis and reflect on key quality criteria of academic work. They are able to critically assess the current status of their own thesis, formulate specific questions, and receive constructive feedback and integrate it into their further work. Furthermore, students present the results of their Bachelor’s thesis appropriately within an academic context and structure their presentation according to the standards of a research community. They develop theory-based arguments, explain their methodological approach in a comprehensible manner, and critically discuss their findings with regard to scientific and practical implications.
Prerequisites for the course
None
Course content
• Structure and Quality Criteria of Academic Theses:
Review of key structural principles (introduction, theory, methodology, results, discussion), coherence of argumentation, logical flow, and academic writing style.
• Reflection on the Current Work Status:
Assessment of individual progress, typical challenges in the research process, and dealing with open questions and uncertainties.
• Feedback Culture in an Academic Context:
Criteria-based peer feedback, providing and receiving constructive feedback, and revising work based on feedback.
• Scientific Presentation of Results:
Structure of a research or conference presentation (research problem, theoretical background, methodology, results, implications), data visualization, and audience-appropriate communication.
• Argumentation and Discussion at Research Level_
Theory-driven interpretation of findings, positioning within the existing body of research, critical reflection on limitations, and derivation of scientific and practical implications.
• Responding to Questions from the Academic Community:
Justifying methodological decisions, addressing critical comments, and responding to academic questions in a precise and structured manner.
Review of key structural principles (introduction, theory, methodology, results, discussion), coherence of argumentation, logical flow, and academic writing style.
• Reflection on the Current Work Status:
Assessment of individual progress, typical challenges in the research process, and dealing with open questions and uncertainties.
• Feedback Culture in an Academic Context:
Criteria-based peer feedback, providing and receiving constructive feedback, and revising work based on feedback.
• Scientific Presentation of Results:
Structure of a research or conference presentation (research problem, theoretical background, methodology, results, implications), data visualization, and audience-appropriate communication.
• Argumentation and Discussion at Research Level_
Theory-driven interpretation of findings, positioning within the existing body of research, critical reflection on limitations, and derivation of scientific and practical implications.
• Responding to Questions from the Academic Community:
Justifying methodological decisions, addressing critical comments, and responding to academic questions in a precise and structured manner.
Recommended specialist literature
• Bänsch, A., & Alewell, D. (2020). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten. Berlin/Boston: Walter De Gruyter GmbH.
• Heesen. B. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Methodenwissen für Wirtschafts-, Ingenieur- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
• Oehlrich, M. (2022). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben: Schritt für Schritt zur Bachelor- und Master-Thesis in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.
• Theisen, M. R., & Theisen, M. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Erfolgreich bei Bachelor- und Masterarbeit. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
• Heesen. B. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Methodenwissen für Wirtschafts-, Ingenieur- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
• Oehlrich, M. (2022). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben: Schritt für Schritt zur Bachelor- und Master-Thesis in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.
• Theisen, M. R., & Theisen, M. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Erfolgreich bei Bachelor- und Masterarbeit. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
Assessment methods and criteria
Presentation
Language
English
Number of ECTS credits awarded
4
Semester hours per week
Planned teaching and learning method
Coaching in the implementation by bachelor thesis supervisors (physical and virtual meetings)
Semester/trimester in which the course/module is offered
6